Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics Graduate Student Association
The Effect of Temperature on Anopheles Mosquito Population Dynamics and the Potential for Malaria Transmission
Beck-Johnson LM, Nelson WA, Paaijmans KP, Read AF, Thomas MB, et al.
Megan Greischar, Britt Koskella
Kurt J Vandergrift, Nina Wale, Jonathan E Epstein
Follow us on TwitterMy Tweets
Tagscgsa blog elementary school Great Insect Fair GSA malaria media mosquito networking Outreach outside academia popular science professional development programming publicity public outreach R science education statistics STEM Talk trivia vaccine-preventable disease vaccines vector-borne disease workshop
Some people have reported that most of the available times for journal club conflicted with their lab meetings. In the interest of getting as many people involved as possible, I decided to create a slightly higher resolution poll with more available slots. Please fill in the following poll by highlighting all areas where you ARE available. Journal club will last about an hour on average, but people are more than welcome to come late or leave early.
Note: if you’re one of the three people who completed the previous poll, I would still appreciate you filling out this poll as well.
All posts to this blog are a reflection of the views of that particular author, not the CIDD Graduate Student Association as a whole. In order to keep discussion open but directed, any comments or opinions about a specific post should be directed to the author of that post, either publicly in a comment on that specific post or in private correspondence.
These policies are in place because this blog is meant to be a place for individual grad students to discuss and explore their own ideas, moderated by the CIDD Graduate Student Association as a whole, not solely a place for the CIDD GSA to collectively post about things already discussed by the group. Directing responses to specific posts at other graduate students involved with this blog is likely to be fruitless as they may not be familiar with the subject at hand.
Hi fellow CIDDers, In 2012 a group of scientists from the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands published a report of experiments to understand the mechanisms of flu airborne transmission in a pandemic flu strain (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1534.short). This research involved a gain of function experiment with the H5N1 strain of the influenza virus and the determinants of airborne spread among ferrets. The results of the research were very interesting, but at the same time they stirred a wave of misinformed fear among the public and scientists, which was mainly driven by sensationalists headlines and exaggeration. There was a symposium held by the NIH in washington DC to try and solve this issue. Scientist became divided over whether to allow these kinds of research to continue forward or ban any kind of gain of function experiment. While now we are in 2014, the polemic has intensified and a group called “The Cambridge Working group” (http://www.cambridgeworkinggroup.org/) was formed and their main objective is to exaggerate the risks associated with doing gain of function experiments in “potential pandemic strains”. They are asking for an Asilomar type of meeting (back in the day this was organized in the fears over recombinant DNA technology) and come up with rules and restrictions on this kind of work. While dialog is important, another group of scientist have felt that this is a one sided effort in order to impose unreasonable restrictions. This group is called “Scientists for science” (http://www.scientistsforscience.org/) which goal is to help the public understand that the resources and facilities exist for working with potential pandemic strains are the safest for this endeavor and that fear is not the way to advance our understanding of these strains. While there has been a record of accidents in biosafety facilities, nowadays these are taken care of by the current set of standards and safety regulations put in place.
Scientists for science is looking for a meeting in which both sides can give their point of view. However, we feel that this kind of meeting can neither be organized by the cambridge working group, nor scientists for science. It must be a neutral entity that allows for a balanced dialog and no personal agendas are allowed.
If you are more interested in knowing more visit the two groups websites and make a choice to which side to follow. It is very very important that as an infectious disease researcher you have your voice heard, since this may have a big impact on the research that we may be or not be allowed to do in the future.
I’m part of scientists for science, but this doesn’t mean you have to side with me.
Please forward this to everyone you know.
It’s that time of year again – time to schedule our weekly journal club meetings.
I’m hoping to use journal club somewhat differently this year, and have it focus more on discussion about science and scientific tools (particularly programming and mathematical tools) as well as paper discussions. We can talk more about this at the first meeting.
To foster freer discussion, it may be nice to host journal club somewhere other than MSC. Potentially a coffee shop downtown, or the Rathskellar. Our first meeting, however, will be in MSC, where we will schedule people for journal club slots and talk about what people want to see from journal club.
Without further ado: http://doodle.com/q2t3cmmqryke54pk Please fill it out by Thursday, August 28th.
If you can’t make any of these times but would otherwise definitely come to journal club every week, please e-mail me.
Please join us for lunch with Dr. Michael Turelli (UC-Davis) immediately following his CIDD seminar! RSVP with your food preferences below by Wednesday, August 27th at 5pm.
When: Thursday, August 28th 12:00pm – 1:00pm
Where: W-203 Millennium Sciences Complex
Spending too much time at you lab bench? Fitness classes at the White Building are free with your Penn State ID this week through next Wednesday.
Next Tuesday, August 19, CGSA is lunching with Wayne Geerling. He will be giving a short presentation on the Intangibles of Teaching followed by an open discussion on how graduate students (and all teachers) should approach teaching, how to make learning fun and interesting, and effective tools to add to our teaching toolboxes.
For those of us with long-term career plans that include teaching, or for those of us who expect TA-ing to be the most teaching we will ever do, the workshop and discussion should be valuable to learn about public speaking and science communication, integral to any career path, teaching aside.
We would like to open this up to all of CIDD so that we can hear current lecturers and senior faculty chime in with their perspectives on teaching, which would add to the conversation. Spread the word to friends in Ento or Eco grad programs as well. Should be a fun and interesting lunch.
Date: Tuesday, August 19
Time: 12 – 1 p.m.
Place: W-203 in MSC